How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Congo: Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP

Chile

163.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Congo

180.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Chile rank

25th

Congo rank

23rd

Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP over time

Chile
Congo

How they compare

Congo currently reports 180.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 163.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 17.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Congo ahead.

Chile ranks 25th and Congo ranks 23rd of 179 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Congo	Difference	Ahead
1960s	358.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	1,147 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	788.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
1970s	282.83 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	1,136 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	853.3 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
1980s	343.74 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	638.88 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	295.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
1990s	336.24 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	880.77 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	544.52 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
2000s	380.52 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	521.76 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	141.24 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
2010s	199.21 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	200.79 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	1.58 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo
2020s	171.2 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	197.79 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	26.59 constant LCU per US$ of GDP	Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (constant lcu), per unit of gdp, Chile or Congo?: Congo, at 180.16 constant LCU per US$ of GDP against 163.03 constant LCU per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2025.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (constant lcu), per unit of gdp between Chile and Congo?: 17.13 constant LCU per US$ of GDP, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Congo?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Chile and Congo rank globally for exports of goods and services (constant lcu), per unit of gdp?: Chile ranks 25th and Congo ranks 23rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Congo: Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-lcu-per-unit-of-gdp/chile/congo-rep/">Chile vs Congo: Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Exports of goods and services (constant LCU), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant LCU per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 179 places, 7,734 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 13 September 2026

Exports of goods and services (constant LCU) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.