Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bolivia
9,285 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
8,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bolivia rank
153rd
Zimbabwe rank
156th

Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bolivia
  • Zimbabwe
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196119922023

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 9,285 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bolivia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Bolivia ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 169 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1970s 2,183 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,445 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,262 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 1,840 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,407 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,567 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 3,240 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,765 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 5,838 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,602 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 236.14 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2010s 8,661 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,599 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62.15 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia
2020s 8,782 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,314 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bolivia or Zimbabwe?
Bolivia, at 9,285 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 8,692 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
593 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Zimbabwe?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Bolivia and Zimbabwe rank globally for exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bolivia ranks 153rd and Zimbabwe ranks 156th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bolivia/zimbabwe/">Bolivia vs Zimbabwe: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
203 places, 8,433 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.