Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita

Hong Kong, China
87,457 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
OECD members
11,765 constant 2015 US$ per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
5th
OECD members rank
7th

Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • OECD members
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119932025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 87,457 constant 2015 US$ per person against 11,765 constant 2015 US$ per person in OECD members, a difference of 75,692 constant 2015 US$ per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 7.4 times OECD members's.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 7th of 172 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China OECD members Difference Ahead
1970s 4,515 constant 2015 US$ per person 1,788 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,727 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 10,823 constant 2015 US$ per person 2,649 constant 2015 US$ per person 8,173 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 28,293 constant 2015 US$ per person 4,353 constant 2015 US$ per person 23,939 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 53,501 constant 2015 US$ per person 7,083 constant 2015 US$ per person 46,418 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 82,754 constant 2015 US$ per person 9,556 constant 2015 US$ per person 73,198 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 82,164 constant 2015 US$ per person 11,096 constant 2015 US$ per person 71,068 constant 2015 US$ per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita, Hong Kong, China or OECD members?
Hong Kong, China, at 87,457 constant 2015 US$ per person against 11,765 constant 2015 US$ per person in OECD members as of 2025.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita between Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
75,692 constant 2015 US$ per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and OECD members?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Hong Kong, China and OECD members rank globally for exports of goods and services (constant 2015 us$), per capita?
Hong Kong, China ranks 5th and OECD members ranks 7th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-constant-2015-us-per-capita/hong-kong-sar-china/oecd-members/">Hong Kong, China vs OECD members: Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$), per capita
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
206 places, 9,010 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Exports of goods and services (constant 2015 US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.