Eswatini vs Tunisia: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Eswatini
126,407 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
127,007 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
114th
Tunisia rank
113th

Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • Tunisia
050.0k100.0k150.0k197419982023

How they compare

Tunisia currently reports 127,007 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 126,407 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 600 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 48 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 113th of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 5 and Tunisia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 13,431 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,006 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,425 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 22,785 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 21,033 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,751 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 51,087 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 45,366 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,721 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 96,768 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 94,749 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,020 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2010s 108,226 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 122,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 13,871 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 119,311 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 100,213 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19,098 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Eswatini or Tunisia?
Tunisia, at 127,007 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 126,407 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Eswatini and Tunisia?
600 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Tunisia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Tunisia?
48 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Tunisia rank globally for exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 114th and Tunisia ranks 113th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Tunisia: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/tunisia/">Eswatini vs Tunisia: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,275 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.