Congo vs Libya: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre

Congo
22,698 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
Libya
21,456 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
159th
Libya rank
161st

Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Libya
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k197720002023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 22,698 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 21,456 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 1,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Libya ahead.

Congo ranks 159th and Libya ranks 161st of 198 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Libya Difference Ahead
1970s 1,380 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,438 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,059 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1980s 3,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,247 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,018 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
1990s 4,163 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,846 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 683.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2000s 13,332 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 15,825 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 2,493 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Libya
2010s 24,661 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 17,243 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,418 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 18,187 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,911 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,275 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre, Congo or Libya?
Congo, at 22,698 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 21,456 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2021.
What is the difference in exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre between Congo and Libya?
1,242 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Libya?
42 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
How do Congo and Libya rank globally for exports of goods and services (bop, current us$), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 159th and Libya ranks 161st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Libya: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-of-goods-and-services-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/libya/">Congo vs Libya: Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
243 places, 9,275 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports of goods and services (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.