Guatemala vs Portugal: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Guatemala
1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
108th
Portugal rank
107th

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Guatemala
  • Portugal
0250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 65,010 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 108th and Portugal ranks 107th of 175 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Portugal Difference Ahead
1970s 372,633 constant LCU per square kilometre 79,159 constant LCU per square kilometre 293,474 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 280,809 constant LCU per square kilometre 129,524 constant LCU per square kilometre 151,285 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 449,503 constant LCU per square kilometre 297,107 constant LCU per square kilometre 152,397 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 694,472 constant LCU per square kilometre 497,219 constant LCU per square kilometre 197,253 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 934,504 constant LCU per square kilometre 768,807 constant LCU per square kilometre 165,697 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala
2020s 1.03 million constant LCU per square kilometre 969,860 constant LCU per square kilometre 63,430 constant LCU per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Guatemala or Portugal?
Portugal, at 1.13 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 1.06 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Guatemala and Portugal?
65,010 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Portugal?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Portugal rank globally for exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Guatemala ranks 108th and Portugal ranks 107th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Portugal: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/portugal/">Guatemala vs Portugal: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.