Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
33.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
37.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
38th
Sri Lanka rank
37th

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Sri Lanka
010.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M50.0M196119922023

How they compare

Sri Lanka currently reports 37.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 33.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 4.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.1 times Cote d'Ivoire's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 37th of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1990s 15.97 million constant LCU per square kilometre 14.56 million constant LCU per square kilometre 1.42 million constant LCU per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 16.74 million constant LCU per square kilometre 21.16 million constant LCU per square kilometre 4.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2010s 24.30 million constant LCU per square kilometre 42.24 million constant LCU per square kilometre 17.95 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2020s 30.41 million constant LCU per square kilometre 34.22 million constant LCU per square kilometre 3.81 million constant LCU per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Sri Lanka?
Sri Lanka, at 37.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre against 33.82 million constant LCU per square kilometre in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
4.00 million constant LCU per square kilometre, with Sri Lanka ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka rank globally for exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 38th and Sri Lanka ranks 37th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/sri-lanka/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.