Botswana vs Ecuador: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Botswana
109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
116,934 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
154th
Ecuador rank
153rd

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Botswana
  • Ecuador
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 116,934 constant LCU per square kilometre against 109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 6,966 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Ecuador ahead.

Botswana ranks 154th and Ecuador ranks 153rd of 175 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 4 and Ecuador in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 9,354 constant LCU per square kilometre 27,344 constant LCU per square kilometre 17,990 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 25,791 constant LCU per square kilometre 30,055 constant LCU per square kilometre 4,264 constant LCU per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 47,306 constant LCU per square kilometre 38,606 constant LCU per square kilometre 8,700 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 73,915 constant LCU per square kilometre 70,515 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,400 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 129,267 constant LCU per square kilometre 100,417 constant LCU per square kilometre 28,850 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 122,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 110,279 constant LCU per square kilometre 12,410 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Botswana or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 116,934 constant LCU per square kilometre against 109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Botswana and Ecuador?
6,966 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Ecuador?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Ecuador rank globally for exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Botswana ranks 154th and Ecuador ranks 153rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Ecuador: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/botswana/ecuador/">Botswana vs Ecuador: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.