Australia vs Botswana: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre

Australia
88,226 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana
109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
157th
Botswana rank
154th

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Botswana
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,226 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 21,742 constant LCU per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Australia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 157th and Botswana ranks 154th of 175 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Botswana Difference Ahead
1970s 5,729 constant LCU per square kilometre 9,354 constant LCU per square kilometre 3,626 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1980s 7,365 constant LCU per square kilometre 25,791 constant LCU per square kilometre 18,426 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
1990s 14,724 constant LCU per square kilometre 47,306 constant LCU per square kilometre 32,582 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2000s 30,972 constant LCU per square kilometre 73,915 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,943 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 58,973 constant LCU per square kilometre 129,267 constant LCU per square kilometre 70,294 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 79,717 constant LCU per square kilometre 122,688 constant LCU per square kilometre 42,971 constant LCU per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre, Australia or Botswana?
Botswana, at 109,968 constant LCU per square kilometre against 88,226 constant LCU per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre between Australia and Botswana?
21,742 constant LCU per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Botswana?
49 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Australia and Botswana rank globally for exports as a capacity to import (constant lcu), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 157th and Botswana ranks 154th of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Botswana: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/exports-as-a-capacity-to-import-constant-lcu-per-square-kilometre/australia/botswana/">Australia vs Botswana: Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU), per square kilometre
Unit
constant LCU per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
175 places, 7,086 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Exports as a capacity to import (constant LCU) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.