Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Expense
Sudan
9.7%
in 2016
Zimbabwe
11.0%
in 2018
Sudan rank
152nd
Zimbabwe rank
149th
Expense over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 11.0% against 9.7% in Sudan, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 157 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.7% | 9.5% | 6.2% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 11.6% | 20.8% | 9.3% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher expense, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 11.0% against 9.7% in Sudan as of 2018.
- What is the difference in expense between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 1.3%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for expense?
- Sudan ranks 152nd and Zimbabwe ranks 149th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Government Finance Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Expense (% of GDP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Expense is a decrease in net worth resulting from a transaction. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) which is the total income earned through the production of goods and services in an economic territory during an accounting period.