Spain vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Spain
21,618 US dollar
in 2022
Türkiye
14,880 US dollar
in 2021
Spain rank
5th
Türkiye rank
3rd

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Spain
  • Türkiye
10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k30.0k35.0k199520082022

How they compare

Spain currently reports 21,618 US dollar against 14,880 US dollar in Türkiye, a difference of 6,738 US dollar.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.5 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Spain ahead.

Spain ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 27 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Spain averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Spain Türkiye Difference Ahead
2000s 25,458 US dollar 24,350 US dollar 1,108 US dollar Spain
2010s 24,060 US dollar 27,794 US dollar 3,733 US dollar Türkiye
2020s 23,732 US dollar 17,497 US dollar 6,236 US dollar Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Spain or Türkiye?
Spain, at 21,618 US dollar against 14,880 US dollar in Türkiye as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Spain and Türkiye?
6,738 US dollar, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Spain and Türkiye?
14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
How do Spain and Türkiye rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Spain ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Spain vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/spain/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/spain/turkiye-2/">Spain vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.