Slovenia vs Spain: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Slovenia
1,721 US dollar
in 2022
Spain
21,618 US dollar
in 2022
Slovenia rank
4th
Spain rank
5th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Slovenia
  • Spain
010.0k20.0k30.0k199520082022

How they compare

Spain currently reports 21,618 US dollar against 1,721 US dollar in Slovenia, a difference of 19,897 US dollar.

That makes Spain's figure about 12.6 times Slovenia's.

Across all 28 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.

Slovenia ranks 4th and Spain ranks 5th of 7 countries.

Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Slovenia Spain Difference Ahead
1990s 988.2 US dollar 13,325 US dollar 12,336 US dollar Spain
2000s 1,139 US dollar 20,077 US dollar 18,938 US dollar Spain
2010s 1,817 US dollar 24,060 US dollar 22,243 US dollar Spain
2020s 1,803 US dollar 23,028 US dollar 21,225 US dollar Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Slovenia or Spain?
Spain, at 21,618 US dollar against 1,721 US dollar in Slovenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Slovenia and Spain?
19,897 US dollar, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Slovenia and Spain?
28 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2022.
How do Slovenia and Spain rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Slovenia ranks 4th and Spain ranks 5th of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Slovenia vs Spain: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/slovenia-2/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/slovenia-2/spain/">Slovenia vs Spain: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.