Poland vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Poland
19,260 US dollar
in 2022
Türkiye
14,880 US dollar
in 2021
Poland rank
2nd
Türkiye rank
3rd

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Poland
  • Türkiye
10.0k20.0k30.0k200320122022

How they compare

Poland currently reports 19,260 US dollar against 14,880 US dollar in Türkiye, a difference of 4,380 US dollar.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Türkiye's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Türkiye ahead.

Poland ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 7 countries.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Türkiye Difference Ahead
2000s 13,305 US dollar 24,350 US dollar 11,045 US dollar Türkiye
2010s 13,709 US dollar 27,794 US dollar 14,085 US dollar Türkiye
2020s 17,399 US dollar 17,497 US dollar 98 US dollar Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Poland or Türkiye?
Poland, at 19,260 US dollar against 14,880 US dollar in Türkiye as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Poland and Türkiye?
4,380 US dollar, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Türkiye?
14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
How do Poland and Türkiye rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Poland ranks 2nd and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/poland-2/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/poland-2/turkiye-2/">Poland vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.