Poland vs Slovenia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Poland
19,260 US dollar
in 2022
Slovenia
1,721 US dollar
in 2022
Poland rank
2nd
Slovenia rank
4th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Poland
  • Slovenia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k199520082022

How they compare

Poland currently reports 19,260 US dollar against 1,721 US dollar in Slovenia, a difference of 17,539 US dollar.

That makes Poland's figure about 11.2 times Slovenia's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Poland ranks 2nd and Slovenia ranks 4th of 7 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Poland Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 9,743 US dollar 1,323 US dollar 8,420 US dollar Poland
2010s 13,709 US dollar 1,817 US dollar 11,892 US dollar Poland
2020s 18,019 US dollar 1,803 US dollar 16,216 US dollar Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Poland or Slovenia?
Poland, at 19,260 US dollar against 1,721 US dollar in Slovenia as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Poland and Slovenia?
17,539 US dollar, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Slovenia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
How do Poland and Slovenia rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Poland ranks 2nd and Slovenia ranks 4th of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Poland vs Slovenia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/poland-2/slovenia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/poland-2/slovenia-2/">Poland vs Slovenia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.