Korea vs Netherlands: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Korea
39,151 US dollar
in 2021
Netherlands
23,963 US dollar
in 2022
Korea rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Korea
  • Netherlands
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199520082022

How they compare

Korea currently reports 39,151 US dollar against 23,963 US dollar in Netherlands, a difference of 15,188 US dollar.

That makes Korea's figure about 1.6 times Netherlands's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Netherlands ahead.

Korea ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 3 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Korea Netherlands Difference Ahead
2010s 25,401 US dollar 29,544 US dollar 4,143 US dollar Netherlands
2020s 38,201 US dollar 30,173 US dollar 8,028 US dollar Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Korea or Netherlands?
Korea, at 39,151 US dollar against 23,963 US dollar in Netherlands as of 2021.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Korea and Netherlands?
15,188 US dollar, with Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Netherlands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2021.
How do Korea and Netherlands rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Korea ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Korea vs Netherlands: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/korea/netherlands-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/korea/netherlands-2/">Korea vs Netherlands: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.