Iceland vs Liechtenstein: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Iceland
488 US dollar
in 2019
Liechtenstein
44 US dollar
in 2021
Iceland rank
24th
Liechtenstein rank
27th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Iceland
  • Liechtenstein
0200400600199520082021

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 488 US dollar against 44 US dollar in Liechtenstein, a difference of 444 US dollar.

That makes Iceland's figure about 11.1 times Liechtenstein's.

Across all 20 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 24th and Liechtenstein ranks 27th of 27 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Liechtenstein Difference Ahead
2000s 227.1 US dollar 24.9 US dollar 202.2 US dollar Iceland
2010s 407.1 US dollar 40 US dollar 367.1 US dollar Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Iceland or Liechtenstein?
Iceland, at 488 US dollar against 44 US dollar in Liechtenstein as of 2019.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Iceland and Liechtenstein?
444 US dollar, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Liechtenstein?
20 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
How do Iceland and Liechtenstein rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Iceland ranks 24th and Liechtenstein ranks 27th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Liechtenstein: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/iceland/liechtenstein/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/iceland/liechtenstein/">Iceland vs Liechtenstein: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.