France vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

France
56,567 US dollar
in 2022
Lithuania
1,078 US dollar
in 2022
France rank
3rd
Lithuania rank
5th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • France
  • Lithuania
020.0k40.0k60.0k199520082022

How they compare

France currently reports 56,567 US dollar against 1,078 US dollar in Lithuania, a difference of 55,489 US dollar.

That makes France's figure about 52.5 times Lithuania's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 27 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 52,306 US dollar 768 US dollar 51,538 US dollar France
2010s 56,590 US dollar 834.1 US dollar 55,756 US dollar France
2020s 59,438 US dollar 1,138 US dollar 58,300 US dollar France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, France or Lithuania?
France, at 56,567 US dollar against 1,078 US dollar in Lithuania as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between France and Lithuania?
55,489 US dollar, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Lithuania?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do France and Lithuania rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
France ranks 3rd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/france/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/france/lithuania-2/">France vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.