Cyprus vs North Macedonia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Cyprus
642 US dollar
in 2022
North Macedonia
280 US dollar
in 2022
Cyprus rank
23rd
North Macedonia rank
26th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Cyprus
  • North Macedonia
200400600800200820152022

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 642 US dollar against 280 US dollar in North Macedonia, a difference of 362 US dollar.

That makes Cyprus's figure about 2.3 times North Macedonia's.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 23rd and North Macedonia ranks 26th of 27 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 673.7 US dollar 243.9 US dollar 429.8 US dollar Cyprus
2020s 633.33 US dollar 304 US dollar 329.33 US dollar Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Cyprus or North Macedonia?
Cyprus, at 642 US dollar against 280 US dollar in North Macedonia as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Cyprus and North Macedonia?
362 US dollar, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and North Macedonia?
13 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2022.
How do Cyprus and North Macedonia rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Cyprus ranks 23rd and North Macedonia ranks 26th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs North Macedonia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/cyprus/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/cyprus/north-macedonia/">Cyprus vs North Macedonia: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.