Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Cyprus
642 US dollar
in 2022
Luxembourg
1,000 US dollar
in 2022
Cyprus rank
23rd
Luxembourg rank
22nd

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Cyprus
  • Luxembourg
05001.0k1.5k199520082022

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1,000 US dollar against 642 US dollar in Cyprus, a difference of 358 US dollar.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.6 times Cyprus's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 27 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 784 US dollar 1,375 US dollar 591 US dollar Luxembourg
2010s 673.7 US dollar 1,227 US dollar 553.4 US dollar Luxembourg
2020s 633.33 US dollar 1,090 US dollar 456.33 US dollar Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Cyprus or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 1,000 US dollar against 642 US dollar in Cyprus as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Cyprus and Luxembourg?
358 US dollar, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Luxembourg?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Cyprus and Luxembourg rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Cyprus ranks 23rd and Luxembourg ranks 22nd of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/cyprus/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/cyprus/luxembourg/">Cyprus vs Luxembourg: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.