Croatia vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Croatia
2,392 US dollar
in 2022
Lithuania
1,078 US dollar
in 2022
Croatia rank
2nd
Lithuania rank
5th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Croatia
  • Lithuania
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520082022

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 2,392 US dollar against 1,078 US dollar in Lithuania, a difference of 1,314 US dollar.

That makes Croatia's figure about 2.2 times Lithuania's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Croatia has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 3 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Lithuania Difference Ahead
2000s 2,124 US dollar 664 US dollar 1,460 US dollar Croatia
2010s 2,298 US dollar 834.1 US dollar 1,464 US dollar Croatia
2020s 2,470 US dollar 1,138 US dollar 1,332 US dollar Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Croatia or Lithuania?
Croatia, at 2,392 US dollar against 1,078 US dollar in Lithuania as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Croatia and Lithuania?
1,314 US dollar, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lithuania?
19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
How do Croatia and Lithuania rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Croatia ranks 2nd and Lithuania ranks 5th of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/croatia-2/lithuania-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/croatia-2/lithuania-2/">Croatia vs Lithuania: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.