Croatia vs Germany: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Croatia
2,392 US dollar
in 2022
Germany
70,261 US dollar
in 2022
Croatia rank
2nd
Germany rank
2nd

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Croatia
  • Germany
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199520082022

How they compare

Germany currently reports 70,261 US dollar against 2,392 US dollar in Croatia, a difference of 67,869 US dollar.

That makes Germany's figure about 29.4 times Croatia's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 2nd and Germany ranks 2nd of 3 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Germany Difference Ahead
2000s 2,124 US dollar 73,958 US dollar 71,834 US dollar Germany
2010s 2,298 US dollar 72,177 US dollar 69,880 US dollar Germany
2020s 2,470 US dollar 72,277 US dollar 69,807 US dollar Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Croatia or Germany?
Germany, at 70,261 US dollar against 2,392 US dollar in Croatia as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Croatia and Germany?
67,869 US dollar, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Germany?
19 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
How do Croatia and Germany rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Croatia ranks 2nd and Germany ranks 2nd of 3 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Germany: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/croatia-2/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/croatia-2/germany/">Croatia vs Germany: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.