Bulgaria vs Portugal: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Bulgaria
4,306 US dollar
in 2022
Portugal
4,894 US dollar
in 2022
Bulgaria rank
17th
Portugal rank
14th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Portugal
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520082022

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 4,894 US dollar against 4,306 US dollar in Bulgaria, a difference of 588 US dollar.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Bulgaria's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Portugal has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 17th and Portugal ranks 14th of 27 countries.

Portugal has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Portugal Difference Ahead
2000s 960.44 US dollar 5,403 US dollar 4,442 US dollar Portugal
2010s 1,614 US dollar 5,456 US dollar 3,843 US dollar Portugal
2020s 2,922 US dollar 5,413 US dollar 2,491 US dollar Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Bulgaria or Portugal?
Portugal, at 4,894 US dollar against 4,306 US dollar in Bulgaria as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Bulgaria and Portugal?
588 US dollar, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Portugal?
22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2022.
How do Bulgaria and Portugal rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Bulgaria ranks 17th and Portugal ranks 14th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Portugal: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/bulgaria/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/bulgaria/portugal/">Bulgaria vs Portugal: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.