Bulgaria vs Kazakhstan: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Bulgaria
4,306 US dollar
in 2022
Kazakhstan
3,366 US dollar
in 2020
Bulgaria rank
17th
Kazakhstan rank
19th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Kazakhstan
02.0k4.0k6.0k200120112022

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 4,306 US dollar against 3,366 US dollar in Kazakhstan, a difference of 940 US dollar.

That makes Bulgaria's figure about 1.3 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 27 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2010s 1,764 US dollar 5,140 US dollar 3,377 US dollar Kazakhstan
2020s 2,119 US dollar 3,366 US dollar 1,247 US dollar Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Bulgaria or Kazakhstan?
Bulgaria, at 4,306 US dollar against 3,366 US dollar in Kazakhstan as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Bulgaria and Kazakhstan?
940 US dollar, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Kazakhstan?
5 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2020.
How do Bulgaria and Kazakhstan rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Bulgaria ranks 17th and Kazakhstan ranks 19th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Kazakhstan: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/bulgaria/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/bulgaria/kazakhstan/">Bulgaria vs Kazakhstan: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.