Belgium vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Belgium
12,938 US dollar
in 2022
Türkiye
14,880 US dollar
in 2021
Belgium rank
6th
Türkiye rank
3rd

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Belgium
  • Türkiye
10.0k20.0k30.0k199520082022

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 14,880 US dollar against 12,938 US dollar in Belgium, a difference of 1,942 US dollar.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Türkiye has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 27 countries.

Türkiye has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Türkiye Difference Ahead
2000s 11,646 US dollar 24,350 US dollar 12,704 US dollar Türkiye
2010s 13,135 US dollar 27,794 US dollar 14,658 US dollar Türkiye
2020s 14,040 US dollar 17,497 US dollar 3,458 US dollar Türkiye

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Belgium or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 14,880 US dollar against 12,938 US dollar in Belgium as of 2021.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Belgium and Türkiye?
1,942 US dollar, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Türkiye?
14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2021.
How do Belgium and Türkiye rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Belgium ranks 6th and Türkiye ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/belgium/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/belgium/turkiye-2/">Belgium vs Türkiye: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.