Austria vs Sweden: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts

Austria
8,816 US dollar
in 2022
Sweden
7,294 US dollar
in 2022
Austria rank
10th
Sweden rank
12th

Environmentally related tax revenue accounts over time

  • Austria
  • Sweden
05.0k10.0k15.0k199520082022

How they compare

Austria currently reports 8,816 US dollar against 7,294 US dollar in Sweden, a difference of 1,522 US dollar.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.2 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Sweden ahead.

Austria ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 12th of 27 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 9,812 US dollar 12,268 US dollar 2,456 US dollar Sweden
2010s 9,922 US dollar 11,827 US dollar 1,905 US dollar Sweden
2020s 9,439 US dollar 8,976 US dollar 463.67 US dollar Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally related tax revenue accounts, Austria or Sweden?
Austria, at 8,816 US dollar against 7,294 US dollar in Sweden as of 2022.
What is the difference in environmentally related tax revenue accounts between Austria and Sweden?
1,522 US dollar, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Sweden?
15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Austria and Sweden rank globally for environmentally related tax revenue accounts?
Austria ranks 10th and Sweden ranks 12th of 27 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Sweden: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/austria/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-related-tax-revenue-accounts/austria/sweden/">Austria vs Sweden: Environmentally related tax revenue accounts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally related tax revenue accounts
Unit
US dollar
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
37 places, 847 data points, 1995–2022
Last refreshed

This dataset presents the data collected from OECD and partner economies on environmentally related tax revenue accounts with a breakdown by tax-base category and industrial activity. Taxes levied on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are explicitly reported in two sub-categories: an energy related part (recorded as an energy tax) and a non-energy related part, such as certain GHG emissions related to landfills or agriculture (recorded as a pollution tax). Four "memo items" (i.e. information items that do not change the total) are included: (i) Certain land taxes; (ii) Taxes on oil and natural gas extraction; (iii) Taxes on the resource rent; (iv) Elevated value added taxes levied on environmentally related tax-bases. The OECD ERTR accounts are consistent with the existing data collection by Eurostat and are in line with the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting - Central Framework (SEEA-CF). The dataset is updated on a biennial basis. For EU countries, it includes the information on ERTR accounts reported to Eurostat. Dataset release date: 2026 July Contact: ENV.Stat@oecd.org For further details on the dataset consult: OECD (2023), Methodological Guidelines for Environmentally Related Tax Revenue Accounts, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/d752d120-en.