Slovak Republic vs South Africa: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Slovak Republic
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0269 Percentage change against 0.0029 Percentage change in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.024 Percentage change.
That makes South Africa's figure about 9.2 times Slovak Republic's.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Slovak Republic ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Slovak Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Slovak Republic | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0037 Percentage change | -0.0085 Percentage change | 0.0122 Percentage change | Slovak Republic |
| 2000s | 0.0063 Percentage change | 0.0055 Percentage change | 0.0008 Percentage change | Slovak Republic |
| 2010s | 0.0006 Percentage change | -0.0043 Percentage change | 0.0049 Percentage change | Slovak Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Slovak Republic or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.0269 Percentage change against 0.0029 Percentage change in Slovak Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Slovak Republic and South Africa?
- 0.024 Percentage change, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Slovak Republic and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Slovak Republic and South Africa rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Slovak Republic ranks 2nd and South Africa ranks 1st of 3 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services