Poland vs Türkiye: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Poland
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 0.0073 Percentage change against 0.0008 Percentage change in Poland, a difference of 0.0065 Percentage change.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 8.6 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Poland averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0014 Percentage change | -0.0052 Percentage change | 0.0067 Percentage change | Poland |
| 2000s | 0.001 Percentage change | -0.0052 Percentage change | 0.0062 Percentage change | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.0011 Percentage change | 0.0021 Percentage change | 0.001 Percentage change | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Poland or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 0.0073 Percentage change against 0.0008 Percentage change in Poland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Poland and Türkiye?
- 0.0065 Percentage change, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Türkiye?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Poland and Türkiye rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Poland ranks 5th and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services