New Zealand vs Slovak Republic: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- New Zealand
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0178 Percentage change against 0.0029 Percentage change in Slovak Republic, a difference of 0.0149 Percentage change.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 6.1 times Slovak Republic's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
New Zealand ranks 4th and Slovak Republic ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.008 Percentage change | 0.0037 Percentage change | 0.0044 Percentage change | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.0074 Percentage change | 0.0063 Percentage change | 0.0012 Percentage change | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.0292 Percentage change | 0.0006 Percentage change | 0.0285 Percentage change | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, New Zealand or Slovak Republic?
- New Zealand, at 0.0178 Percentage change against 0.0029 Percentage change in Slovak Republic as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between New Zealand and Slovak Republic?
- 0.0149 Percentage change, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Slovak Republic?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Slovak Republic rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- New Zealand ranks 4th and Slovak Republic ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services