New Zealand vs Russia: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- New Zealand
- Russia
How they compare
Russia currently reports 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0178 Percentage change in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0065 Percentage change.
That makes Russia's figure about 1.4 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Russia ahead.
New Zealand ranks 4th and Russia ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Russia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Russia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.008 Percentage change | 0.0228 Percentage change | 0.0147 Percentage change | Russia |
| 2000s | 0.0074 Percentage change | 0.006 Percentage change | 0.0014 Percentage change | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 0.0292 Percentage change | 0.0091 Percentage change | 0.0201 Percentage change | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, New Zealand or Russia?
- Russia, at 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0178 Percentage change in New Zealand as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between New Zealand and Russia?
- 0.0065 Percentage change, with Russia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Russia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do New Zealand and Russia rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- New Zealand ranks 4th and Russia ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services