Netherlands vs Slovenia: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Netherlands
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Netherlands, a difference of 0 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.
Netherlands ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 6th of 7 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Netherlands averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Netherlands | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0004 Percentage change | 0.0001 Percentage change | 0.0005 Percentage change | Slovenia |
| 2000s | -0.0006 Percentage change | -0.0001 Percentage change | 0.0005 Percentage change | Slovenia |
| 2010s | -0 Percentage change | -0.0008 Percentage change | 0.0008 Percentage change | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Netherlands or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Netherlands as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Netherlands and Slovenia?
- 0 Percentage change, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Slovenia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Netherlands and Slovenia rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Netherlands ranks 7th and Slovenia ranks 6th of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services