Malta vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Malta
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Malta ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0041 Percentage change | -0.0012 Percentage change | 0.0053 Percentage change | Malta |
| 2000s | -0.0066 Percentage change | -0.0006 Percentage change | 0.0061 Percentage change | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2010s | 0 Percentage change | 0.0001 Percentage change | 0.0001 Percentage change | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Malta or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Malta, at 0 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 0 Percentage change, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Malta and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Malta ranks 21st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 21st of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services