Lithuania vs Türkiye: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of

Lithuania
0.0035 Percentage change
in 2018
Türkiye
0.0073 Percentage change
in 2018
Lithuania rank
3rd
Türkiye rank
2nd

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time

  • Lithuania
  • Türkiye
-0.0500.05199620072018

How they compare

Türkiye currently reports 0.0073 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0038 Percentage change.

That makes Türkiye's figure about 2.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Türkiye ahead.

Lithuania ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Türkiye in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Türkiye Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0343 Percentage change -0.0052 Percentage change 0.0291 Percentage change Türkiye
2000s 0.005 Percentage change -0.0052 Percentage change 0.0102 Percentage change Lithuania
2010s 0.0028 Percentage change 0.0021 Percentage change 0.0007 Percentage change Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Lithuania or Türkiye?
Türkiye, at 0.0073 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania as of 2018.
What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Lithuania and Türkiye?
0.0038 Percentage change, with Türkiye ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Türkiye?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
How do Lithuania and Türkiye rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Türkiye ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Türkiye: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/lithuania-2/turkiye-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/lithuania-2/turkiye-2/">Lithuania vs Türkiye: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
52 places, 1,196 data points, 1996–2018
Last refreshed

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services