Lithuania vs South Africa: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Lithuania
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0269 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0234 Percentage change.
That makes South Africa's figure about 7.8 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was South Africa ahead.
Lithuania ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 7 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0343 Percentage change | -0.0085 Percentage change | 0.0259 Percentage change | South Africa |
| 2000s | 0.005 Percentage change | 0.0055 Percentage change | 0.0005 Percentage change | South Africa |
| 2010s | 0.0028 Percentage change | -0.0043 Percentage change | 0.0071 Percentage change | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Lithuania or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.0269 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Lithuania and South Africa?
- 0.0234 Percentage change, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and South Africa rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Lithuania ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services