Lithuania vs Russian Federation: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Lithuania
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania, a difference of 0.0208 Percentage change.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 7.0 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Lithuania ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0343 Percentage change | 0.0228 Percentage change | 0.0571 Percentage change | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | 0.005 Percentage change | 0.006 Percentage change | 0.001 Percentage change | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.0028 Percentage change | 0.0091 Percentage change | 0.0063 Percentage change | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Lithuania or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0035 Percentage change in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Lithuania and Russian Federation?
- 0.0208 Percentage change, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Russian Federation?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Russian Federation rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Lithuania ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 7 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services