Korea vs South Africa: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Korea
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 0.0269 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in Korea, a difference of 0.0269 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Korea ahead.
Korea ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 3 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0011 Percentage change | -0.0085 Percentage change | 0.0074 Percentage change | Korea |
| 2000s | -0.0006 Percentage change | 0.0055 Percentage change | 0.0061 Percentage change | South Africa |
| 2010s | -0.0006 Percentage change | -0.0043 Percentage change | 0.0037 Percentage change | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Korea or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 0.0269 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Korea and South Africa?
- 0.0269 Percentage change, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and South Africa?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Korea and South Africa rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Korea ranks 3rd and South Africa ranks 1st of 3 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services