Iceland vs Italy: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Iceland
- Italy
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Italy, a difference of 0 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 29th and Italy ranks 31st of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Italy in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Italy | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0556 Percentage change | 0.0004 Percentage change | 0.0551 Percentage change | Iceland |
| 2000s | -0.0674 Percentage change | -0.0013 Percentage change | 0.0661 Percentage change | Italy |
| 2010s | -0.0027 Percentage change | -0.0003 Percentage change | 0.0024 Percentage change | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Iceland or Italy?
- Iceland, at -0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Italy as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Iceland and Italy?
- 0 Percentage change, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Italy?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Italy rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Iceland ranks 29th and Italy ranks 31st of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services