France vs India: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of

France
-0.0003 Percentage change
in 2018
India
-0.0003 Percentage change
in 2018
France rank
35th
India rank
38th

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time

  • France
  • India
-0.01-0.00500.0050.010.015199620072018

How they compare

France currently reports -0.0003 Percentage change against -0.0003 Percentage change in India, a difference of 0 Percentage change.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was France ahead.

France ranks 35th and India ranks 38th of 42 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and India in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade France India Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0008 Percentage change -0.0019 Percentage change 0.0011 Percentage change France
2000s -0.0013 Percentage change 0.0022 Percentage change 0.0034 Percentage change India
2010s -0.0003 Percentage change 0 Percentage change 0.0003 Percentage change India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, France or India?
France, at -0.0003 Percentage change against -0.0003 Percentage change in India as of 2018.
What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between France and India?
0 Percentage change, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and India?
23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
How do France and India rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
France ranks 35th and India ranks 38th of 42 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs India: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/france/india/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/environmentally-adjusted-multifactor-productivity-contribution-of-non-cultivated/france/india/">France vs India: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources
Unit
Percentage change
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
52 places, 1,196 data points, 1996–2018
Last refreshed

Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services