Finland vs Russian Federation: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Finland
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0203 Percentage change in Finland, a difference of 0.004 Percentage change.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Russian Federation ahead.
Finland ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0064 Percentage change | 0.0228 Percentage change | 0.0164 Percentage change | Russian Federation |
| 2000s | -0.0081 Percentage change | 0.006 Percentage change | 0.0141 Percentage change | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 0.0114 Percentage change | 0.0091 Percentage change | 0.0024 Percentage change | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Finland or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 0.0243 Percentage change against 0.0203 Percentage change in Finland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Finland and Russian Federation?
- 0.004 Percentage change, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Russian Federation?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Finland and Russian Federation rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Finland ranks 3rd and Russian Federation ranks 2nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services