Costa Rica vs Peru: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Costa Rica
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports -0.0004 Percentage change against -0.0033 Percentage change in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0029 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Peru ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 41st and Peru ranks 39th of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0446 Percentage change | -0.2303 Percentage change | 0.1857 Percentage change | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0025 Percentage change | -0.0022 Percentage change | 0.0047 Percentage change | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | -0.0022 Percentage change | -0.0004 Percentage change | 0.0018 Percentage change | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Costa Rica or Peru?
- Peru, at -0.0004 Percentage change against -0.0033 Percentage change in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Costa Rica and Peru?
- 0.0029 Percentage change, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Peru?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Peru rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Costa Rica ranks 41st and Peru ranks 39th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services