Colombia vs Denmark: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Colombia
- Denmark
How they compare
Colombia currently reports -0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Denmark, a difference of 0 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Colombia ahead.
Colombia ranks 30th and Denmark ranks 32nd of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0005 Percentage change | -0.0099 Percentage change | 0.0105 Percentage change | Colombia |
| 2000s | 0.0011 Percentage change | -0.0045 Percentage change | 0.0056 Percentage change | Colombia |
| 2010s | -0.0038 Percentage change | 0.0017 Percentage change | 0.0055 Percentage change | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Colombia or Denmark?
- Colombia, at -0 Percentage change against -0 Percentage change in Denmark as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Colombia and Denmark?
- 0 Percentage change, with Colombia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Denmark?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Colombia and Denmark rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Colombia ranks 30th and Denmark ranks 32nd of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services