China vs Portugal: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- China
- Portugal
How they compare
China currently reports 0.0024 Percentage change against 0.002 Percentage change in Portugal, a difference of 0.0004 Percentage change.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Portugal's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was China ahead.
China ranks 10th and Portugal ranks 12th of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0112 Percentage change | -0.0016 Percentage change | 0.0128 Percentage change | China |
| 2000s | -0.0017 Percentage change | -0.0009 Percentage change | 0.0008 Percentage change | Portugal |
| 2010s | -0.0002 Percentage change | 0.0027 Percentage change | 0.0029 Percentage change | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, China or Portugal?
- China, at 0.0024 Percentage change against 0.002 Percentage change in Portugal as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between China and Portugal?
- 0.0004 Percentage change, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Portugal?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do China and Portugal rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- China ranks 10th and Portugal ranks 12th of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services