Australia vs Malta: Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of over time
- Australia
- Malta
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in Malta, a difference of 0 Percentage change.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 21st and Malta ranks 21st of 42 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0001 Percentage change | 0.0041 Percentage change | 0.0042 Percentage change | Malta |
| 2000s | -0.0005 Percentage change | -0.0066 Percentage change | 0.0061 Percentage change | Australia |
| 2010s | -0 Percentage change | 0 Percentage change | 0 Percentage change | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of, Australia or Malta?
- Australia, at 0 Percentage change against 0 Percentage change in Malta as of 2018.
- What is the difference in environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of between Australia and Malta?
- 0 Percentage change, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malta?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2018.
- How do Australia and Malta rank globally for environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — contribution of?
- Australia ranks 21st and Malta ranks 21st of 42 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity — Contribution of non-cultivated biological resources. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity EAMFP growth measures the residual growth in the joint production of both the desirable and the undesirable outputs that cannot be explained by changes in the consumption of factor inputs (including labour, produced capital and natural capital). Therefore, for a given growth of input use, EAMFP increases when GDP increases or when pollution decreases. As part of the growth accounting framework underlying the EAMFP indicator, the growth contribution of natural capital and growth adjustment for pollution abatement indicators are derived: Growth contribution of natural capital - measures to what extent a country's growth in output is attributable to natural resource use; Growth adjustment for pollution abatement - measures to what extent a country's GDP growth should be corrected for pollution abatement efforts - adding what has been undervalued due to resources being diverted to pollution abatement, or deducing the ‘excess' growth which is generated at the expense of environmental quality. For further details on the methodology please consult: oe.cd/eamfp Environmentally adjusted multifactor productivity: Accounting for renewable natural resources and ecosystem services