Kiribati vs Naoero: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Kiribati
- Naoero
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 3.93 million USD against 2.2 million USD in Naoero, a difference of 1.73 million USD.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.8 times Naoero's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 87th and Naoero ranks 89th of 93 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$, Kiribati or Naoero?
- Kiribati, at 3.93 million USD against 2.2 million USD in Naoero as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$ between Kiribati and Naoero?
- 1.73 million USD, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Naoero?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2018.
- How do Kiribati and Naoero rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$?
- Kiribati ranks 87th and Naoero ranks 89th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.