Czechia vs Romania: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Czechia
- Romania
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2,957 million USD against 2,503 million USD in Romania, a difference of 454 million USD.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 23rd and Romania ranks 26th of 93 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,517 million USD | 435 million USD | 1,082 million USD | Czechia |
| 2010s | 2,448 million USD | 1,506 million USD | 941.66 million USD | Czechia |
| 2020s | 2,646 million USD | 2,040 million USD | 605.81 million USD | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$, Czechia or Romania?
- Czechia, at 2,957 million USD against 2,503 million USD in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$ between Czechia and Romania?
- 454 million USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Romania?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Romania rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$?
- Czechia ranks 23rd and Romania ranks 26th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.