Costa Rica vs Egypt: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- Costa Rica
- Egypt
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 104.9 million USD against 87.99 million USD in Egypt, a difference of 16.91 million USD.
That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Egypt ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 59th and Egypt ranks 62nd of 93 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Egypt | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.48 million USD | 186.17 million USD | 143.69 million USD | Egypt |
| 2010s | 81.75 million USD | 192.67 million USD | 110.92 million USD | Egypt |
| 2020s | 91.71 million USD | 151.11 million USD | 59.41 million USD | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$, Costa Rica or Egypt?
- Costa Rica, at 104.9 million USD against 87.99 million USD in Egypt as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$ between Costa Rica and Egypt?
- 16.91 million USD, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Egypt?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Costa Rica and Egypt rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$?
- Costa Rica ranks 59th and Egypt ranks 62nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.