China, Hong Kong SAR vs Russian Federation: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$ over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 5,530 million USD against 4,917 million USD in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 613 million USD.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,200 million USD | 769.94 million USD | 430.5 million USD | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2010s | 2,074 million USD | 1,719 million USD | 354.91 million USD | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 3,825 million USD | 4,652 million USD | 827.38 million USD | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$, China, Hong Kong SAR or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 5,530 million USD against 4,917 million USD in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2021.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$ between China, Hong Kong SAR and Russian Federation?
- 613 million USD, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Russian Federation?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2021.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Russian Federation rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value us$?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 15th and Russian Federation ranks 13th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.