Indonesia vs Israel: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Indonesia
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 2,256 million USD against 1,817 million USD in Indonesia, a difference of 439 million USD.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.2 times Indonesia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Indonesia ahead.
Indonesia ranks 26th and Israel ranks 24th of 93 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Indonesia averaged higher in 2 and Israel in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2,025 million USD | 1,388 million USD | 637.28 million USD | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 1,975 million USD | 1,695 million USD | 279.89 million USD | Indonesia |
| 2020s | 2,067 million USD | 2,139 million USD | 71.31 million USD | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Indonesia or Israel?
- Israel, at 2,256 million USD against 1,817 million USD in Indonesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Indonesia and Israel?
- 439 million USD, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Israel?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Indonesia and Israel rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Indonesia ranks 26th and Israel ranks 24th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.