China, Macao SAR vs Georgia: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- China, Macao SAR
- Georgia
How they compare
China, Macao SAR currently reports 258.83 million USD against 213.13 million USD in Georgia, a difference of 45.7 million USD.
That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.2 times Georgia's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, China, Macao SAR has been ahead every year.
China, Macao SAR ranks 46th and Georgia ranks 49th of 93 countries.
China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Macao SAR | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 123.03 million USD | 19.8 million USD | 103.24 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
| 2010s | 122.85 million USD | 75.99 million USD | 46.87 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
| 2020s | 245.21 million USD | 143.15 million USD | 102.06 million USD | China, Macao SAR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, China, Macao SAR or Georgia?
- China, Macao SAR, at 258.83 million USD against 213.13 million USD in Georgia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between China, Macao SAR and Georgia?
- 45.7 million USD, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Georgia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do China, Macao SAR and Georgia rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- China, Macao SAR ranks 46th and Georgia ranks 49th of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.