Canada vs Japan: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Canada
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 51,778 million USD against 23,554 million USD in Canada, a difference of 28,224 million USD.
That makes Japan's figure about 2.2 times Canada's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 4th and Japan ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8,205 million USD | 51,740 million USD | 43,535 million USD | Japan |
| 2010s | 10,078 million USD | 49,940 million USD | 39,863 million USD | Japan |
| 2020s | 16,579 million USD | 52,107 million USD | 35,528 million USD | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Canada or Japan?
- Japan, at 51,778 million USD against 23,554 million USD in Canada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Canada and Japan?
- 28,224 million USD, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Japan?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
- How do Canada and Japan rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Canada ranks 4th and Japan ranks 2nd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value US$, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.