Serbia vs Yemen: Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value
Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value over time
- Serbia
- Yemen
How they compare
Yemen currently reports 16,988 million SLC against 15,330 million SLC in Serbia, a difference of 1,658 million SLC.
That makes Yemen's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Yemen ahead.
Serbia ranks 35th and Yemen ranks 33rd of 93 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,137 million SLC | 23,297 million SLC | 18,160 million SLC | Yemen |
| 2010s | 13,017 million SLC | 18,139 million SLC | 5,123 million SLC | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value, Serbia or Yemen?
- Yemen, at 16,988 million SLC against 15,330 million SLC in Serbia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value between Serbia and Yemen?
- 1,658 million SLC, with Yemen ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Yemen?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2012.
- How do Serbia and Yemen rank globally for environmental protection (general government expenditure) — value?
- Serbia ranks 35th and Yemen ranks 33rd of 93 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Environmental protection (general government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.